[hts-users:00887] Re: Training by imposing decision trees
Heiga ZEN (Byung Ha CHUN) wrote:
In this case parameters of generated MMF are equal to those of MMF
used to construct decision trees.
So you should re-estimate model parameters
Good point - I hadn't considered the case where the decision tree being
imposed might have been trained on different data, I just thought about
the case where it matched the data - although the case of differing data
is obviously more likely and more interesting.
However, it may cause some segmentation errors at the first iteration
of HERest if you use different training data to construct these two MMFs.
I think HERest offers a solution to this, called "2-model re-estimation"
in which one model (the one trained on the target data, but before it is
reclustered) is used to compute the forward-backward probabilities and
these are then used to update the parameters of a second model (the
re-clustered one). The tying schemes in the two models do not have to
match. See the HTK book for details.
Simon
- Follow-Ups
-
- [hts-users:00890] Re: Training by imposing decision trees, Alexis Moinet
- References
-
- [hts-users:00876] Training by imposing decision trees, Thomas Drugman
- [hts-users:00877] Re: Training by imposing decision trees, Heiga ZEN (Byung Ha CHUN)
- [hts-users:00884] Re: Training by imposing decision trees, Simon King
- [hts-users:00885] Re: Training by imposing decision trees, Heiga ZEN (Byung Ha CHUN)