[hts-users:01395] Questions about "reg.base" when doing adaptation

["QiXiong Tu" <tuqixiong@xxxxxxxxx>]

Hi,All

In the file "reg.base", it's written:

 

<CLASS> 1 {dh^ih-s+p=aa@3_1/A:1_0_2/B:1-1-3@1-1&2-10#x-x$x-x!x-x;x-x|x/C:0+0+3/D:conj_1/E:det+1@2+5&x+x#x+x/F:adj_4/G:17_13/H:11=6@2=1|0/I:0_0/J:28+19-2.state[2].stream[4].mix[2] ..........

 

here, let's assume "dh^ih-s+p........state[2].stream[4].mix[2]" as the second mixture of  the stream "~p "lf0_s2_47-4"".

Actually, there're a lot of "~p "lf0_s2_47-4"" in the model file "MMF".

 

Then my questions are listed as follows:

 

1.when classing (generate the "reg.base" file), I think HHed tool using "dh^ih-s+p........state[2].stream[4].mix[2]"  as a delegate for so many "~p "lf0_s2_47-4"" in the model file "MMF", just because it's found firstly when classing, is it so?

 

2.Do HTS do adaptation of the second mixture of MSD? And how to do it?

 

Many thanks for your kind help!
 

Best Regards,
   QiXiong Tu