[hts-users:01428] Re: Regarding the new IT command of HHEd of HTS-2.1RC2
- Subject: [hts-users:01428] Re: Regarding the new IT command of HHEd of HTS-2.1RC2
- From: Tienshyang Huei Liang <tshlmail-hts@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sun, 15 Jun 2008 23:32:48 -0700 (PDT)
- Delivered-to: hts-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=yahoo.com; h=Received:X-Mailer:Date:From:Reply-To:Subject:To:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding:Message-ID; b=pk2wbL34dND3ug5xfkcZhpgwk+QHdgqZuMi3sc8N/D1nnw09eZIZ3EFJ++QDplLxOAoPAs+gZiwlRr3E+JrsH3cLJhP23wLYl2DIiZ58GVPWzR+ARONqM6eyDi8fuc4hv6Z9WOrdFpFpxPSYQtKfE0u9Pyaq8FjUwflepWOYpSs=;
Sorry for my carelessness. It didn't occur to me that my clustered.mmf(A) had been reestimated by HERest for 5 iterations so as that it couldn't be the same as clustered.mmf(B). Thank you for your kindly reminder. I hope it didn't take you too much time to reconfirm the IT command.
Regards,
Hui LIANG
--- On Mon, 16/6/08, Heiga ZEN (Byung Ha CHUN) <zen@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> I checked it on my environment but I get the exactly the
> same mmfs for clustered.mmf(A) and (B).
> Did you see un-reestimated clustered.mmf(A) (just after TB
> clustering) ?
> I doubt that you compared clustered.mmf(A) reestimated by
> HERest with un-reestimated clustered.mmf(B).
__________________________________________________________
Sent from Yahoo! Mail.
A Smarter Email http://uk.docs.yahoo.com/nowyoucan.html
- References
-
- [hts-users:01427] Re: Regarding the new IT command of HHEd of HTS-2.1RC2, Heiga ZEN (Byung Ha CHUN)