[hts-users:01687] Re: ReadString: String too long
- Subject: [hts-users:01687] Re: ReadString: String too long
- From: Tienshyang Huei Liang <tshlmail-hts@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 12 Sep 2008 05:51:40 -0700 (PDT)
- Delivered-to: hts-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=yahoo.com; h=X-YMail-OSG:Received:X-Mailer:Date:From:Reply-To:Subject:To:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding:Message-ID; b=P7S0Y6qmlevNIXaQ/HIFokT1w477v123JHYbJVusKHL1ZbfERVY66/uDGhib6tan/GH3RwcmYbe9eNHSQD5GKC5GeuOM4n6VhlZFX+P1yer7Hhr2LNRgCUpCX3GWeYVRKFR5+MJonaJ9iS7Mkrg0LbHQ5UGspGDPuBTB1zalNjo=;
> I don't know why many users still use HTS-2.0 (or 2.0.1). Because you
> don't have enough time to port your modifications for HTS-2.0 to HTS-2.1?
>
> I personally believe that HTS-2.1 is quite good. Let's start shifting
> from 2.0 to 2.1 :-)
Sorry for my out-of-date solution. I met the "String too long" problem more than one year ago, when the HTS version was the HTS 2.0 final version. I don't know the source code has been improved in HTS 2.1 as I didn't do the same experiment on HTS 2.1.
--
Hui LIANG (the official spelling on my passport)
http://www.idiap.ch/contact.php?nMemberId=352
- References
-
- [hts-users:01684] Re: ReadString: String too long, Heiga ZEN (Byung Ha CHUN)