[hts-users:02024] Fwd: Re: Poor voice quality & embedded reestimation (monophone) errors

[Tomasz Kuczmarski <faqster@xxxxxxxxx>]

Yes, the whole process passed in one go uninterrupted.

Please find some samples attached.

I can send some samples of the same utterances synthesized by Festival clunits voice built on the exact same database of speech for comparison if needed.

2009/6/16 Xavi Gonzalvo <xavi.gonzalvo@xxxxxxxxx>

Did you do the train in one go?

Can we listen to any sample?

Try to train a voice with 100 files, it usually helps to see any errors. 100 files are usually enough to have some samples for each phone and it should sound something intelligible.

Regards

2009/6/16 Tomasz Kuczmarski <faqster@xxxxxxxxx>

They seem fine. I used the same limits for pitchmark extraction while building a clunits voice for Festival. At that time, PDA has successfully found pitch periods.

2009/6/16 Tóth Bálint <toth.b@xxxxxxxxxxx>

Sorry for the basic question, but are the low and high limits of f0 extraction set fine?

Best Regards,
Bálint Tóth

Tomasz Kuczmarski írta:

The labelling is fine. I have hand checked the bigger part of the database. Moreover, I have built a unit selection synthesizer on this database and it works well.

I am just wondering whether eliminating any of the presented errors would help improve the quality.

--
Best regards,

Tomasz Kuczmarski



e-mail: faqster@xxxxxxxxx
skype : faqster

--
Xavi.

--
Best regards,

Tomasz Kuczmarski



e-mail: faqster@xxxxxxxxx
skype : faqster

--
Best regards,

Tomasz Kuczmarski



e-mail: faqster@xxxxxxxxx
skype : faqster

-- 
Best regards,

Tomasz Kuczmarski



e-mail: faqster@xxxxxxxxx
skype : faqster

Attachment: Alice1.wav
Description: Wave audio

Attachment: Alice2.wav
Description: Wave audio