[Subject Prev][Subject Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

[hts-users:02504] Re: Is this a bug of hts-2.1.1 straight demo?


Ok, I don't think it is a compiler's fault because I'm using HTS 2.1 on
the same computer and it doesn't fail.

I will run a test with the data extracted by the old procedure and
compare to the new one. I will tell you the result tomorrow when I will
get them

Sebastien


Le lundi 31 mai 2010 à 21:05 +0800, 康世胤 a écrit :
> no, I never met warning -2331 in my log
> 
> 2010/5/31 Sébastien Le Maguer <Sebastien.Le_maguer@xxxxxxxx>
>         When I'm looking the log files I've found some error messages
>         in the fullcontext reestimation step which look like that:
>         
>         
>         WARNING [-2331]  UpdateModels: ih^ng-dh
>         +eh=r@1_3/A:0_1_2/B:1-0-3@1-1&1-6#1-3$1-4!0-1;0-1|0/C:1+1
>         +2/D:content_3/E:pps+1@1+3&1+2#0
>         +1/F:content_1/G:10_7/H:6=3@2=1|L-L%/I:0=0/J:16+10-2[82]
>         copied: only 0 egs
>         
>         After it propagates in every embedded reestimation step. Have
>         you go this ?
>         
>         Sebastien
>         
>         Le samedi 29 mai 2010 à 10:25 +0200, Sébastien Le Maguer a
>         écrit : 
>         
>         > I'm on Ubuntu and I'm using gcc
>         > 
>         > Le 29.05.2010 01:45, 康世胤 a écrit :
>         > > No, i  go back for 2.1 now.
>         > > Which compiler do you use? Mine is icc. Maybe it is the compiler's fault?
>         > >
>         > > 2010/5/28, Sébastien Le Maguer<Sebastien.Le_maguer@xxxxxxxx>:
>         > >    
>         > >> I try to debug it. For the moment, i've found that in the StepBack the
>         > >> beta calculus lead to log(0) and so no path is found. Have you got some
>         > >> news ?
>         > >>
>         > >> Sebastien
>         > >>
>         > >> Le jeudi 20 mai 2010 à 16:15 +0800, 康世胤 a écrit :
>         > >>      
>         > >>> yes
>         > >>>
>         > >>>
>         > >>>
>         > >>> 2010/5/20 Sébastien Le Maguer<Sebastien.Le_maguer@xxxxxxxx>
>         > >>>          Hi,
>         > >>>
>         > >>>          I've got this error too. When you try to run HMGenS do you
>         > >>>          have a
>         > >>>          segmentation fault?
>         > >>>
>         > >>>          Regards,
>         > >>>          Sebastien
>         > >>>
>         > >>>
>         > >>>          Le mardi 18 mai 2010 à 13:43 +0800, 康世胤 a écrit :
>         > >>>
>         > >>>          >  A error occurred when I try to train the straight demo with
>         > >>>          the
>         > >>>          >  default configurations in this section
>         > >>>          >
>         > >>>          >
>         > >>>
>         > >>> ===================================================================================
>         > >>>          >  Start generating speech parameter sequences (stc) at Mon May
>         > >>>          17
>         > >>>          >  17:29:59 CST 2010
>         > >>>          >
>         > >>>
>         > >>> ===================================================================================
>         > >>>          >
>         > >>>          >
>         > >>>          >
>         > >>>          >  Here is the error messages:
>         > >>>          >
>         > >>>          >  ......
>         > >>>          >  Pruning-On[1500.0 100.0 5000.0]
>         > >>>          >   Generating Label alice01.lab
>         > >>>          >   Total number of frames = 3172
>         > >>>          >    PdfStream[1]: 3172 frames
>         > >>>          >    PdfStream[2]: 3172 frames
>         > >>>          >    PdfStream[3]: 3172 frames
>         > >>>          >   EM-based parameter generation (Hidden: MIX, STATE)
>         > >>>          >   WARNING [-7324]  StepBack: Bad data or over pruning
>         > >>>          >   in /usr/local/hts-2.1.1/bin/HMGenS
>         > >>>          >   WARNING [-9999]  ParamGen: failed to compute output prob
>         > >>>          >  in /usr/local/hts-2.1.1/bin/HMGenS
>         > >>>          >    Iteration 1: Average LogP = -3.152585e+06
>         > >>>          >  Error in /usr/local/hts-2.1.1/bin/HMGenS -A -B
>         > >>>          >
>         > >>>          -C
>         > >>> /home/saser/work/official_demos-2.1.1/HTS-demo_CMU-ARCTIC-SLT_STRAIGHT/configs/syn.cnf
>         > >>> -D -T 1 -S
>         > >>> /home/saser/work/official_demos-2.1.1/HTS-demo_CMU-ARCTIC-SLT_STRAIGHT/data/scp/gen.scp
>         > >>> -t 1500 100 5000  -c 2 -H
>         > >>> /home/saser/work/official_demos-2.1.1/HTS-demo_CMU-ARCTIC-SLT_STRAIGHT/models/qst001/ver1/cmp/stc_all.mmf
>         > >>> -N
>         > >>> /home/saser/work/official_demos-2.1.1/HTS-demo_CMU-ARCTIC-SLT_STRAIGHT/models/qst001/ver1/dur/stc_all.mmf
>         > >>> -M
>         > >>> /home/saser/work/official_demos-2.1.1/HTS-demo_CMU-ARCTIC-SLT_STRAIGHT/gen/qst001/ver1/stc/2
>         > >>> /home/saser/work/official_demos-2.1.1/HTS-demo_CMU-ARCTIC-SLT_STRAIGHT/models/qst001/ver1/cmp/tiedlist
>         > >>> /home/saser/work/official_demos-2.1.1/HTS-demo_CMU-ARCTIC-SLT_STRAIGHT/models/qst001/ver1/dur/tiedlist
>         > >>>          >
>         > >>>          >
>         > >>>          >
>         > >>>          >  Before the error, I got tens of thousands of warnings like
>         > >>>          this:
>         > >>>          >
>         > >>>          >     Converged (norm=3.774747e+01, change=1.620419e-04).
>         > >>>          >   WARNING [-9999]  OutProb: output prob at frame 2 is 0.0
>         > >>>          >  in /usr/local/hts-2.1.1/bin/HMGenS
>         > >>>          >   WARNING [-9999]  OutProb: output prob at frame 3 is 0.0
>         > >>>          >  in /usr/local/hts-2.1.1/bin/HMGenS
>         > >>>          >   WARNING [-9999]  OutProb: output prob at frame 4 is 0.0
>         > >>>          >  in /usr/local/hts-2.1.1/bin/HMGenS
>         > >>>          >   WARNING [-9999]  OutProb: output prob at frame 5 is 0.0
>         > >>>          >  in /usr/local/hts-2.1.1/bin/HMGenS
>         > >>>          >  ......
>         > >>>          >   WARNING [-9999]  OutProb: output prob at frame 3169 is 0.0
>         > >>>          >  in /usr/local/hts-2.1.1/bin/HMGenS
>         > >>>          >   WARNING [-9999]  OutProb: output prob at frame 3170 is 0.0
>         > >>>          >  in /usr/local/hts-2.1.1/bin/HMGenS
>         > >>>          >   WARNING [-9999]  OutProb: output prob at frame 3171 is 0.0
>         > >>>          >  in /usr/local/hts-2.1.1/bin/HMGenS
>         > >>>          >    Average LogP = -9.993695e+09
>         > >>>          >   Generating Label alice02.lab
>         > >>>          >   Total number of frames = 2915
>         > >>>          >    PdfStream[1]: 2915 frames
>         > >>>          >    PdfStream[2]: 2830 frames
>         > >>>          >    PdfStream[3]: 2915 frames
>         > >>>          >
>         > >>>          >
>         > >>>          >
>         > >>>          >  and strange parameter generation log like this: (see the
>         > >>>          change of
>         > >>>          >  iteration 6)
>         > >>>          >
>         > >>>          >   Generating Label alice01.lab
>         > >>>          >   Total number of frames = 3172
>         > >>>          >    PdfStream[1]: 3172 frames
>         > >>>          >    PdfStream[2]: 3172 frames
>         > >>>          >    PdfStream[3]: 3172 frames
>         > >>>          >   Parameter generation considering global variance (GV)
>         > >>>          >    Optimization=NEWTON  step size (init=1.000, inc=1.20,
>         > >>>          dec=0.50)
>         > >>>          >    HMM weight=1.00, GV weight=1.00
>         > >>>          >    Stream: 1
>         > >>>          >    Feature: all
>         > >>>          >     Iteration  1: GV Obj = -8.703781e+00 (HMM:-8.703781e+00
>         > >>>          >  GV:-4.669074e-27)
>         > >>>          >     Iteration  2: GV Obj = -4.485174e+01 (HMM:-6.515020e+00
>         > >>>          >  GV:-3.833672e+01)  Change = -36.147964
>         > >>>          >     Iteration  3: GV Obj = -2.060439e+01 (HMM:-3.695115e+00
>         > >>>          >  GV:-1.690928e+01)  Change = -11.900611
>         > >>>          >     Iteration  4: GV Obj = -1.077798e+01 (HMM:-5.220877e+00
>         > >>>          >  GV:-5.557108e+00)  Change = -2.074204
>         > >>>          >     Iteration  5: GV Obj = -8.299071e+00 (HMM:-6.717686e+00
>         > >>>          >  GV:-1.581385e+00)  Change = 0.404710
>         > >>>          >     Iteration  6: GV Obj = -2.659332e+15 (HMM:-2.115852e+07
>         > >>>          >  GV:-2.659332e+15)  Change = -2659332467537417.500000
>         > >>>          >     Iteration  7: GV Obj = -1.661987e+14 (HMM:-5.289479e+06
>         > >>>          >  GV:-1.661987e+14)  Change = -166198677105619.750000
>         > >>>          >     Iteration  8: GV Obj = -1.038622e+13 (HMM:-1.322297e+06
>         > >>>          >  GV:-1.038622e+13)  Change = -10386216934943.804688
>         > >>>          >     Iteration  9: GV Obj = -6.489885e+11 (HMM:-3.305405e+05
>         > >>>          >  GV:-6.489881e+11)  Change = -648988480495.767700
>         > >>>          >     Iteration 10: GV Obj = -4.054301e+10 (HMM:-8.262077e+04
>         > >>>          >  GV:-4.054293e+10)  Change = -40543012815.267204
>         > >>>          >     Iteration 11: GV Obj = -2.531591e+09 (HMM:-2.065053e+04
>         > >>>          >  GV:-2.531570e+09)  Change = -2531590533.724836
>         > >>>          >     Iteration 12: GV Obj = -1.579305e+08 (HMM:-5.162820e+03
>         > >>>          >  GV:-1.579253e+08)  Change = -157930472.685939
>         > >>>          >     Iteration 13: GV Obj = -9.833805e+06 (HMM:-1.293318e+03
>         > >>>          >  GV:-9.832512e+06)  Change = -9833797.165811
>         > >>>          >     Iteration 14: GV Obj = -6.099850e+05 (HMM:-3.271551e+02
>         > >>>          >  GV:-6.096578e+05)  Change = -609976.683197
>         > >>>          >     Iteration 15: GV Obj = -3.754546e+04 (HMM:-8.622074e+01
>         > >>>          >  GV:-3.745924e+04)  Change = -37537.164351
>         > >>>          >     Iteration 16: GV Obj = -2.279440e+03 (HMM:-2.629029e+01
>         > >>>          >  GV:-2.253150e+03)  Change = -2271.141377
>         > >>>          >     Iteration 17: GV Obj = -1.405188e+02 (HMM:-1.145926e+01
>         > >>>          >  GV:-1.290596e+02)  Change = -132.219760
>         > >>>          >     Iteration 18: GV Obj = -1.528113e+01 (HMM:-7.827290e+00
>         > >>>          >  GV:-7.453843e+00)  Change = -6.982061
>         > >>>          >     Iteration 19: GV Obj = -8.570871e+00 (HMM:-6.957192e+00
>         > >>>          >  GV:-1.613679e+00)  Change = -0.271800
>         > >>>          >     Iteration 20: GV Obj = -8.300441e+00 (HMM:-6.758615e+00
>         > >>>          >  GV:-1.541825e+00)  Change = -0.001369
>         > >>>          >     Converged (norm=3.456561e+03, change=1.369426e-03).
>         > >>>          >
>         > >>>          >
>         > >>>          >
>         > >>>          >  Here is my parameters for the demo configuration, tcl&
>         > >>>          matlab are in
>         > >>>          >  PATH so I do not specify them.
>         > >>>          >
>         > >>>          >  $ ./configure
>         > >>>          --with-sptk-search-path=/usr/local/SPTK-3.3/bin
>         > >>>          >  --with-hts-search-path=/usr/local/hts-2.1.1/bin
>         > >>>          >
>         > >>>          --with-hts-engine-search-path=/usr/local/hts_engine_API-1.03/bin
>         > >>>          >  --with-openfst-search-path=/usr/local/openfst-1.1/bin
>         > >>>          >  --with-straight-path=/usr/local/STRAIGHTV40_007c
>         > >>>          >
>         > >>>          >
>         > >>>          >
>         > >>>          >  Here is my parameters for the hts-2.1.1 configuration
>         > >>>          >
>         > >>>          >  $ ./configure SMAX=11 PAT_LEN=8192
>         > >>>          --prefix=/usr/local/hts-2.1.1
>         > >>>          >  CC=icc CXX=icpc
>         > >>>          >
>         > >>>          >
>         > >>>          >
>         > >>>          >  Here is my icc version
>         > >>>          >
>         > >>>          >  $ icc -V
>         > >>>          >  Intel(R) C Intel(R) 64 Compiler Professional for
>         > >>>          applications running
>         > >>>          >  on Intel(R) 64, Version 11.1    Build 20091130 Package ID:
>         > >>>          >  l_cproc_p_11.1.064
>         > >>>          >  Copyright (C) 1985-2009 Intel Corporation.  All rights
>         > >>>          reserved.
>         > >>>          >  FOR NON-COMMERCIAL USE ONLY
>         > >>>          >
>         > >>>          >
>         > >>>          >
>         > >>>          >
>         > >>>          >  My questions are:
>         > >>>          >  1. Why this error occurred? Is this error a bug?
>         > >>>          >  2. Is the Warings and iteration changes normal? I did not
>         > >>>          find this
>         > >>>          >  kind of messages in the same section of the non-straight
>         > >>>          demo log
>         > >>>          >  file.
>         > >>>          >
>         > >>>          >
>         > >>>          >
>         > >>>          >
>         > >>>          >  the orignal log file is attached.
>         > >>>          >
>         > >>>          >
>         > >>>          >
>         > >>>          >  --
>         > >>>          >  康世胤
>         > >>>          >  Shiyin Kang
>         > >>>          >
>         > >>>
>         > >>>
>         > >>>
>         > >>>
>         > >>>
>         > >>>
>         > >>>        
>         > >>
>         > >>
>         > >>
>         > >>
>         > >>      
>         > >    
>         > 
>         > 
>         
>         
> 
> 
> 
> -- 
> 康世胤
> Shiyin Kang
> 
> kangshiyin@xxxxxxxxx
> Mobile: +86-13810352340
> Tel: +86-10-62775251
> 
> FIT 3-522
> Lab of Human-Computer Speech Interaction,
> Department of Computer Science & Technology,
> Tsinghua University, Beijing, 100084, P.R.China



Follow-Ups
[hts-users:02505] Re: Is this a bug of hts-2.1.1 straight demo?, 康世胤
[hts-users:02510] Re: Is this a bug of hts-2.1.1 straight demo?, 康世胤
References
[hts-users:02482] Is this a bug of hts-2.1.1 straight demo?, 康世胤
[hts-users:02489] Re: Is this a bug of hts-2.1.1 straight demo?, Sébastien Le Maguer
[hts-users:02490] Re: Is this a bug of hts-2.1.1 straight demo?, 康世胤
[hts-users:02491] Re: Is this a bug of hts-2.1.1 straight demo?, Sébastien Le Maguer
[hts-users:02500] Re: Is this a bug of hts-2.1.1 straight demo?, 康世胤
[hts-users:02501] Re: Is this a bug of hts-2.1.1 straight demo?, Sébastien Le Maguer
[hts-users:02502] Re: Is this a bug of hts-2.1.1 straight demo?, Sébastien Le Maguer
[hts-users:02503] Re: Is this a bug of hts-2.1.1 straight demo?, 康世胤