[hts-users:02744] Re: A small question about the tree-lpf.inf
- Subject: [hts-users:02744] Re: A small question about the tree-lpf.inf
- From: Keiichiro Oura <uratec@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 22 Mar 2011 10:26:56 +0900
- Cc: uratec <uratec@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Delivered-to: hts-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:date :x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=RBjGWulk7ER3mCCfZsRvVKq8s1ui/HydWuurVQAbgi0=; b=bnv2uQuga4Ky7zuw0mW+Nh5Ma+LKIwK5PLbKb9S/xw+BDTNM0wSSiEbLs6JMsCS0IV FSodGa8ldTL4ZkvUFHz6jmrpnf1cw8BGRnQvm7ixWKmJPw75lbTu0ZdhjrNS01RvDdTe 8OaYz9DhYC6yZfxakHNDHOlMZVMQFuPPMKXSQ=
- Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:date :x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; b=gWB13NNT0HRJV5NW6Iax8tN3lgTcueUBRvXbbqniLYLHODUCrNUS7RKGsOHnUNKqRi ddCVeKrdq0tMvPtpZia0uLdHsDjFwajaLgbp4HPYJ8tjMKow9FXgne3EbLsMaCwYDndT z0UCgonrJLwc9P2JucMKEyZmKMbV8tBiohxtk=
Hi,
This is the expected result.
For example, ``{*}[2]'' matches ``2nd states in all model''.
Regards,
Keiichiro Oura
2011/3/20 Nicholas Volk <nvolk@xxxxxxxxxx>:
> Just a small sanity check. My tree-lpf.inf for SLT demo is not much of a
> tree:
>
> {*}[2]
> "lpf_s2_1"
> {*}[3]
> "lpf_s3_1"
> {*}[4]
> "lpf_s4_1"
> {*}[5]
> "lpf_s5_1"
> {*}[6]
> "lpf_s6_1"
>
> Is this the expected result? (The quality of the sound produced is fine,
> even though it isn't much of a tree.)
>
> br,
> Nicholas
>
>
>
- References
-
- [hts-users:02734] A small question about the tree-lpf.inf, Nicholas Volk