[Subject Prev][Subject Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

[hts-users:03690] Re:


My guess, the situation is, the distributions estimated by DAEM and EM are obviously different.
That leads to a concrete fact that the derived decision trees have different amounts of leaf nodes.
So the resulting models are of different size, and that's normal.
--
Xingyu Na (那兴宇)
http://www.idiap.ch/~xna/


At 2013-04-03 11:26:58,"Nirmesh Shah" <supernirmesh@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Dear Sir,
      voices/dur.pdf:         data
     voices/gv-lf0.pdf:      data
voices/gv-mgc.pdf:      data
voices/gv-switch.inf:   ASCII text
voices/lf0.pdf:         data
voices/lf0.win1:        ASCII text
voices/lf0.win2:        ASCII text
voices/lf0.win3:        ASCII text
voices/lpf.pdf:         data
voices/lpf.win1:        ASCII text
voices/mgc.pdf:         data
voices/mgc.win1:        ASCII text
voices/mgc.win2:        ASCII text
voices/mgc.win3:        ASCII text
voices/tree-dur.inf:    ASCII text, with very long lines
voices/tree-gv-lf0.inf: ASCII text
voices/tree-gv-mgc.inf: ASCII text
voices/tree-lf0.inf:    ASCII text, with very long lines
voices/tree-lpf.inf:    ASCII text
voices/tree-mgc.inf:    ASCII text, with very long lines


In stats folder in cmp.stats file I got 25431 raws, is it displaying nLeaves?





On Tue, Apr 2, 2013 at 10:20 PM, Sebastien Le Maguer <Sebastien.Le_maguer@xxxxxxxx> wrote:
Hello,

to check this, you only have to use the "file" command if you are on Unix but, according to the size
you have indicated in another mail, I think that you have binary files. Have you checked the number
of leaves in the clustering trees ?

Best regards,
Sébastien Le Maguer
At Tue, 2 Apr 2013 21:30:49 +0530,
Nirmesh Shah wrote:
>
> [1  <text/plain; GB2312 (quoted-printable)>]
>
> [2  <text/html; GB2312 (quoted-printable)>]
> I don't know I am novice. Can you please tell me how to see it?
>
> On Tue, Apr 2, 2013 at 1:02 PM, 那兴宇 <nxy-yzqs@xxxxxxx> wrote:
>
>     Did you save the model in binary mode or text mode?
>
>     --
>     Xingyu Na (那兴宇)
>     http://www.idiap.ch/~xna/
>
>     At 2013-04-02 14:40:55,"Nirmesh Shah" <supernirmesh@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
>         Hello,
>                           After system building in our language for same hour of durations with EM and DAEM algorithm we
>         observed that size of DAEM is less compared to size of EM.
>
>         Can you please tell me is there any specific reason of it?
>
>         On Tue, Feb 19, 2013 at 7:04 AM, Keiichiro Oura <uratec@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
>             Hi,
>
>             It's depend on database.
>
>             Regards,
>             Keiichiro Oura
>
>             2013/2/19 Nirmesh Shah <supernirmesh@xxxxxxxxx>:
>             > Hello,
>             > So is it 10 is enough? or more you should prefer?
>             > Regards,
>             > Nirmesh Shah
>             >
>             >
>             > On Mon, Feb 18, 2013 at 8:07 PM, Keiichiro Oura <uratec@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>             > wrote:
>             >>
>             >> Hi,
>             >>
>             >> > So I change DAEMNITER=5 So is it going to affect DAEM algorithm(due to
>             >> > less
>             >> > no of iteration)?
>             >>
>             >> Number of iteration affect the quality of the synthesized speech.
>             >>
>             >> > and this DAEM algorithm, Does it work for log F0 re-estimation also in
>             >> > system?
>             >>
>             >> Yes.
>             >> Spectrum (mel-cep), pitch (log F0), and duration are estimated in
>             >> HERest simultaneously.
>             >>
>             >> Regards,
>             >> Keiichiro Oura
>             >>
>             >>
>             >> 2013/2/18 Nirmesh Shah <supernirmesh@xxxxxxxxx>:
>             >> > Dear Sir,
>             >> >          While making monophone model with the use of DAEM algorithm, It
>             >> > is
>             >> > taking so much time because DAEMNITER=10 and NITER=5, So at the
>             >> > execution of
>             >> > HERest re-estimation is done for 50 times as it is having structure like
>             >> > this,
>             >> >
>             >> >  if ($daem) {
>             >> >       for ( $i = 1 ; $i <= $daem_nIte ; $i++ ) {
>             >> >          for ( $j = 1 ; $j <= $nIte ; $j++ ) {
>             >> >
>             >> >             # embedded reestimation
>             >> >             $k = $j + ( $i - 1 ) * $nIte;
>             >> >             print("\n\nIteration $k of Embedded Re-estimation\n");
>             >> >             $k = ( $i / $daem_nIte )**$daem_alpha;
>             >> >             shell("$HERest{'mon'} -k $k -H $monommf{'cmp'} -N
>             >> > $monommf{'dur'} -M $model{'cmp'} -R $model{'dur'} $lst{'mon'}
>             >> > $lst{'mon'}");
>             >> >          }
>             >> >       }
>             >> >    }
>             >> > So I change DAEMNITER=5 So is it going to affect DAEM algorithm(due to
>             >> > less
>             >> > no of iteration)?
>             >> > and this DAEM algorithm, Does it work for log F0 re-estimation also in
>             >> > system?
>             >> > Thanks in advance
>             >> >
>             >> > Regards,
>             >> > Nirmesh Shah
>             >> >
>             >> > On Fri, Jan 11, 2013 at 4:50 PM, Keiichiro Oura <uratec@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>             >> > wrote:
>             >> >>
>             >> >> Hi,
>             >> >>
>             >> >> Yes.
>             >> >> Default setting is EM algorithm.
>             >> >>
>             >> >> The other options can be shown by
>             >> >>
>             >> >> ./configure --help
>             >> >>
>             >> >> Regards,
>             >> >> Keiichiro Oura
>             >> >>
>             >> >>
>             >> >> 2013/1/11 Nirmesh Shah <supernirmesh@xxxxxxxxx>:
>             >> >> > Thanks,
>             >> >> > If I don't write it then does it mean that EM algorithm is used?
>             >> >> >
>             >> >> >
>             >> >> > On Fri, Jan 11, 2013 at 2:04 PM, Keiichiro Oura
>             >> >> > <uratec@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>             >> >> > wrote:
>             >> >> >>
>             >> >> >> Hi,
>             >> >> >>
>             >> >> >> You can try DAEM training in the HTS demo script by following
>             >> >> >> command
>             >> >> >> line.
>             >> >> >> ./configure DAEM=1
>             >> >> >>
>             >> >> >> Regards,
>             >> >> >> Keiichiro Oura
>             >> >> >>
>             >> >> >>
>             >> >> >> 2013/1/11 Nirmesh Shah <supernirmesh@xxxxxxxxx>:
>             >> >> >> > Hello,
>             >> >> >> >     I want to know how to use DAEM algorithm in hts,as I have seen
>             >> >> >> > on
>             >> >> >> > hts
>             >> >> >> > website that HERest command support DAEM, does it mean whenever I
>             >> >> >> > use
>             >> >> >> > that
>             >> >> >> > command ,Is it going to use DAEM algorithm for re-estimation? and
>             >> >> >> > what
>             >> >> >> > if I
>             >> >> >> > don' want to use DAEM?
>             >> >> >> >
>             >> >> >> > --
>             >> >> >> > Thanks & Regards,
>             >> >> >> > Nirmesh J. Shah
>             >> >>
>             >> >> >>
>             >> >> >
>             >> >> >
>             >> >> >
>             >> >> > --
>             >> >> > Thanks & Regards,
>             >> >> > Nirmesh J. Shah
>             >> >>
>             >> >>
>             >> >
>             >> >
>             >> >
>             >> > --
>             >> > Thanks & Regards,
>             >> > Nirmesh J. Shah
>             >> >
>             >>
>             >
>             >
>             >
>             > --
>             > Thanks & Regards,
>             > Nirmesh J. Shah
>
>         --
>         Thanks & Regards,
>         Nirmesh J. Shah
>
> --
> Thanks & Regards,
> Nirmesh J. Shah
> M.Tech ( ICT)
>
>




--
Thanks & Regards,
Nirmesh J. Shah
M.Tech ( ICT)


Follow-Ups
[hts-users:03691] Re:, Nirmesh Shah
References
[hts-users:03566], Nirmesh Shah
[hts-users:03567] Re:, Keiichiro Oura
[hts-users:03568] Re:, Nirmesh Shah
[hts-users:03569] Re:, Keiichiro Oura
[hts-users:03627] Re:, Nirmesh Shah
[hts-users:03628] Re:, Keiichiro Oura
[hts-users:03629] Re:, Nirmesh Shah
[hts-users:03630] Re:, Keiichiro Oura
[hts-users:03683] Re:, Nirmesh Shah
[hts-users:03685] Re:, 那兴宇
[hts-users:03687] Re:, Nirmesh Shah
[hts-users:03688] Re:, Sebastien Le Maguer
[hts-users:03689] Re:, Nirmesh Shah