[hts-users:03607] dynamic window specification
- Subject: [hts-users:03607] dynamic window specification
- From: 那兴宇 <nxy-yzqs@xxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 15 Feb 2013 01:01:33 +0800 (CST)
- Delivered-to: hts-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=163.com; s=s110527; h=Received:Date:From:To:Subject: Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-Type:MIME-Version:Message-ID; bh=f0DYcvwz3GGwmCvPrjWsed5hvyYZPlWcUf5P8xZMWbg=; b=g1qpmjqRa7aYJ y0hz9cbsruXFEwl9oURDL92/A6wfTXKW4Bbd7eo5H2PWQKDxegToQIevaZtKCYpA zz2xaSuyYDTB90cJ/f0GPANGrd/voIaEN+rUBlo5bFB98KuYLo6M3g/pmT0klFTb UStSK7ioXYc+sv3oDdUwkLqw2sh4yM=
Hi all,
In current MLPG implementations, either HMGenS or hts_engine_API, the default dynamic window is symmetrical.
But I wonder what would happen if I set unsymmetrical window.
So I checked the HGen(in HTS-2.2) and HTS_model(in hts_engine_API-1.06), found similar codes below;
+ /* set pointer */
+ length = fsize / 2;
+ win->coefficient[i] += length;
+ win->l_width[i] = -length;
+ win->r_width[i] = length;
+ if (fsize % 2 == 0)
+ win->r_width[i]--;
I suppose it means I can set unsymmetrical window like
+ 4 1.0 1.0 [-2.0] 1.0
with '-2.0' be the coeff. for current frame, right?
But what if I set
+ 5 1.0 1.0 [-2.0] 1.0 0.0
as unsymmetrical window in a symmetrical form? Is it the same?
Please drop in any opinion.
Thank you.
Best,
--
Xingyu Na (那兴宇)
http://www.idiap.ch/~xna/
Beijing Institute of Technology [naxy(at)bit.edu.cn]
Idiap Research Institute [xingyu.na(at)idiap.ch]
- Follow-Ups
-
- [hts-users:03608] Re: dynamic window specification, Heiga ZEN (Byung Ha CHUN)