[Subject Prev][Subject Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

[hts-users:02022] Re: Poor voice quality & embedded reestimation (monophone) errors


They seem fine. I used the same limits for pitchmark extraction while building a clunits voice for Festival. At that time, PDA has successfully found pitch periods.

2009/6/16 Tóth Bálint <toth.b@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Sorry for the basic question, but are the low and high limits of f0 extraction set fine?

Best Regards,
Bálint Tóth

Tomasz Kuczmarski írta:

The labelling is fine. I have hand checked the bigger part of the database. Moreover, I have built a unit selection synthesizer on this database and it works well.

I am just wondering whether eliminating any of the presented errors would help improve the quality.





--
Best regards,

Tomasz Kuczmarski



e-mail: faqster@xxxxxxxxx
skype : faqster

Follow-Ups
[hts-users:02023] Re: Poor voice quality & embedded reestimation (monophone) errors, Xavi Gonzalvo
References
[hts-users:02015] Poor voice quality & embedded reestimation (monophone) errors, Tomasz Kuczmarski
[hts-users:02016] Re: Poor voice quality & embedded reestimation (monophone) errors, Tomasz Kuczmarski
[hts-users:02017] Re: Poor voice quality & embedded reestimation (monophone) errors, Simon King
[hts-users:02018] Re: Poor voice quality & embedded reestimation (monophone) errors, Tomasz Kuczmarski
[hts-users:02021] Re: Poor voice quality & embedded reestimation (monophone) errors, Tóth Bálint