Please tell us which paper you are talking about (where the table is from).
But this paper [1] (which I googled) seems to use similar measures (page
15): mel-cepstal distortion for spectral features, and logF0 RMSE
expressed in cent for fundamental frequency.
[1]
http://tcts.fpms.ac.be/publications/regpapers/2013/csl_hypohyper_bptdtd.pdf
Regards, Dietmar
--
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Dipl.-Ing. Dietmar Schabus | Researcher
phone +43 1 5052830-48 | fax -99 | schabus@xxxxxx |
http://userver.ftw.at/~schabus/
FTW Telecommunications Research Center Vienna
Donau-City-Straße 1/3 | 1220 Vienna | Austria | www.ftw.at
On 2013-09-23 02:49, Hea Young Park wrote:
> Hello, everyone.
> I did objective evaluation about HTS system that I had built.
> Below is my calculation about each distance.
> 본문 이미지 1
> Unfortunately, as you can see, the range of mgc and lf0 distance from
> my objective evaluation is so many different from that of the papers
> (see, table below)
>
> 본문 이미지 2
>
> Please let me know if you find something wrong in my calculation.
>
> Below is the result of what I calculated.
>
> - mgc distance : 1.948
>
> - lf0 distance : 0.133
>